Reviewed by Brian Cowell
Precision Simulator Ten —
dare to be different
Are you a simmer who —
Prides themselves on the number of different types of aircraft in their hangar?
Prefers GA or military aircraft to airliners?
Likes to fly
with the minimum amount of preparation?
Congratulates themselves on never having to read the manuals?
If you answered yes to any of the above, then the subject of this
review may not be for you. Read on to check it out, by all means, but
you need to be aware from the very beginning that Precision Simulator
Ten is a simulation designed for professional pilots which needs to be
flown in a professional manner (or else you most assuredly will
experience the inevitable consequences).
So (if you’re still reading) please allow me to begin by explaining
the extent to which Precision Simulator Ten (or PSX, as it usually
known) is distinctly different to any home simulator product that you
have seen before.
PSX in Context
The first thing to understand is that PSX simulates the Boeing 747-400
(or 744, for short) in amazing and minute detail. It comes complete
with many different configurations of the 744 for different airlines,
including both ER and non-ER versions, passenger and freight, but it
focuses closely and solely on individual models of the Boeing 744
can’t fly any other aircraft with it.
|The second point to make at the outset is that
PSX isn’t primarily a product for simmers at all (although it
does support an extremely active group of hard-core simmers —
including many real world 747 pilots — on its forum, as we shall
(most pictures enlarge when clicked)
||In the words of its creator:
“Precision Simulator is a stand-alone flight & systems trainer for
professionals — and for everyone interested in professional
operations”. However, a glance down the extensive list of customers
for the previous version (see
makes it clear that its main customers are Aircrew Training
establishments, as well as universities and a sprinkling of other organisations such as NASA, ARINC, and so on. But nonetheless, one
could also add serious simmers to the list, and indeed some very
serious simmers indeed such as Matt Sheil (
) — his current sim is pictured, left — have been using PSX’s
predecessor to drive their cockpits for over fifteen years, and are
enthusiastically moving over to the new version as I write this.
Many people would probably describe Matt as a cockpit builder
rather than a simmer (his cockpit is even mounted on hydraulic
jacks for full motion), and indeed PSX is a cockpit builder’s
dream, for reasons which I’ll come to soon. Another thing to
notice in the above picture is the presence of an Instructor
Station, which can be seen on the left, behind, and well out
of sight of, the pilots.
|This, of course, is normally a feature of an
FFS (a Full Flight Simulator on a motion platform, used for
aircrew training), but it is central to the PSX philosophy.
I’ll have more to say about that aspect later on, too.
And I suppose the third point to make is that PSX isn’t any kind of
add-on for FSX (or X-Plane or P3D or anything else, for that matter.
So you might say goodbye to FSX and all its attendant problems). PSX
simulates a Boeing 747-400 aircraft in comprehensive, almost obsessive
detail: every light bulb in every switch is modelled (or both of them
if a switch contains two bulbs, with the result that it will become
dimmer if just one fails), as are the 400+ circuit breakers in the
cockpit, which can be pulled and/or collared as in the real thing. It
goes without saying that the aerodynamic model is superb (hand-flying
it is a joy). You also become very aware of the inertia of this huge
aircraft, so that after rolling her 400 tonnes onto a new heading, for
example, it is necessary to apply a touch of opposite aileron at the
end of the turn — as in the real aircraft (as I have been told by a
former 747 pilot).
PSX also has its own built-in dynamic model of the earth’s atmosphere (which is kept updated by METARs) with the ability to simulate less ordinary events too, such as volcanic ash and Clear Air Turbulence (so there’s no need for an external weather generator, either). The
database contains all airports worldwide whose longest runway is at
least 4,600 ft long. Don’t expect to see much eye-candy, though: you
will get all the cues you need for instrument flight training in terms
of runways, weather effects, traffic, and the horizon, but that’s all
(with the result that frame rates of 72 fps are the norm). So the UK
asking price of £289 becomes understandable, especially if you have
ever counted up roughly how much you have spent on additional add-ons
for FSX over the years....
But if you are still thinking that it’s expensive, consider what you
● An unbelievably complete and detailed simulation of the Boeing
747-400, with a huge range of equipment options (which you can readily
● An advanced weather model for the entire planet, which can be set up
as you wish or else you can use METARs to emulate current conditions
(METAR downloads are free).
● An earth model whose accuracy extends to the modelling of sloped runways (there are also individually-configurable EGPWS terrain maps on
both NDs — a take-off from Trondheim is shown below). Weather radar with tilt and gain selectors is built in too, of course.
ND Display - Trondheim Takeoff RWY 09
● Configurable traffic for TCAS training.
● A comprehensive ACARS and despatch system.
● Simulated ATC (including CPDLC).
switch and dial works, and does what it would do on that model
● The simulation gives excellent frame rates even on a modest laptop,
and is extensible over a network to drive the largest cockpit
that you could wish for (see above).
In summary, PSX is an absolutely superb procedural trainer for the
PSX Community and Free Add-ons
I mentioned previously the knowledgeable and lively forum, but may I
stress that I mean “lively” in the sense of “active and interesting” (http://aerowinx.com/forum/forum.php?id=1
), and certainly not lively in the manner of certain bellicose FS forums that we all know and prefer to avoid!
Amongst other things, the PSX forum members produce very useful
add-ons — which they make available at zero cost. At present, we have
As you can see, if by any chance you do find PSX’s built-in visuals a
little minimalist for your taste, you can readily use FSX, P3D,
X-Plane, or Google Earth to give you a more detailed and colourful
outside view — I will undertake an example flight at the end of this
review. The other (and all of these are free, remember) utilities are also very useful: for example, since the flight deck printer in PSX actually works, I use AdaptPSX to print the output to hard copy. The app also interfaces my Aerosoft Australia hardware MCP, so that if I wish to change my heading, for example, I turn a real knob rather than an onscreen virtual one (and AdaptPSX has other useful talents, too).
There is also a growing list of tutorials, including a 64-page “Getting started with PSX” pdf document aimed at getting you flying as quickly with PSX as possible (the next in the series, covering the specifics of flight planning using PFPX and TOPCAT with PSX, is also online), and you can find those on the Miscellaneous page of the Aerowinx site
PSX Has so Much More
One of the inevitable results of its focus on professional flight
training is that simmers will very quickly encounter various features
that they have never seen simulated before, so a fascinating learning
curve results. This is a process which naturally delights the
dedicated procedural simmers — and let’s face it, most people who buy
this product will come into that category.
As an example of the features you may not have seen before — all three
ACPs (Audio Control Panels) are fully functional, so that if you wish
to hear ATC, or marker tones, or ATIS, or whatever, you have to learn
how to configure your ACP to enable you to do so. PSX comes with many
varieties of what it refers to as its ‘human simulations’, which
“...interact as ATC (voice and CPDLC), cabin crew (interphone system
demo), ground crew (towing), air traffic (TCAS), PNF (checklists,
calls, silent tasks), and ATIS” (to quote from the sumptuous 600-page
colour manual that comes with the product). Incidentally, you can
download a 397-page preview version of that manual from a link on the
main Aerowinx introduction page at
The Versatility of PSX
ATC Logon Screen
||In the above list you may have noticed a reference to CPDLC, and you will find that the ACARS system is also modelled. So don’t try
flying PSX without sound, since you need it for ACARS chimes; not to
mention PNF callouts, EGPWS, pushback, and ATC, as well as the
familiar bell, wailer, siren, beeper, and much more. The PNF’s
callouts are configured according to whichever airline’s model of the
744 you are currently flying, naturally; and the PNF can assist you by performing some routine “silent tasks” to lighten your workload
(although you can, if you wish, prevent her or him from doing so). You
will also be grateful for the inclusion of EGPWS terrain contour maps
on the Navigation Display (ND).
But I’ll restrain myself and pause what would be a very long list:
hopefully, you will by now have gained an impression of the range of
PSX’s capabilities, and how much more advanced it is than anything
else available to the home simmer. It’s therefore time for me to delve
into a little more detail of a few aspects of this amazing simulation.
In a Full Flight Simulator (FFS), the pilot is usually being monitored
by someone in the Instructor Station. That person not only sets up the scenario which the pilot is about to fly, but has complete control over the entire environment — not only every aspect (and failure point) of the aircraft itself, but also the external environment in terms of weather, position, and so on. Most home
simulators are by definition a one-person affair, so an Instructor
Station would be something of a luxury.
But once again, PSX is different — here, the Instructor Station is a
fully integrated part of the sim.
PSX is designed from the ground up for cockpit builders, and hence its networking capabilities are extensive. As a result, it’s straightforward to arrange for one person to be flying PSX in, say, London, with another manning the Instructor Station in ... well, anywhere you like, really, via the Internet. Additionally, you can start multiple instances of PSX on the same machine if you wish (perhaps to
drive individual display screens; and add-on utilities such as VisualPSX and AdaptPSX run as clients to a PSX server), or else you
might choose to have the additional PSX instances running on other
computers and networked to a single PSX master instance. The choice is
PSX’s graphical facilities also offer the utmost in flexibility. Each
PSX display screen can be further divided into two, three, or four
subscreens; and each subscreen can be panned and zoomed to show any
part of the cockpit environment. Furthermore, you can switch instantly
between nine such layouts with a single keystroke or button press. So
the way you choose to display the cockpit environment on your
screen(s) (or virtual screen(s)) is totally customizable. For example,
I have a virtual screen of 5760x1200 pixels, so I normally choose to
display PSX in nine layouts of 3840x1200 px, and use the remaining
1920x1200 for other things — the Instructor Station, perhaps an
outside view via Google Earth or FSX, charts, and other supporting
stuff. But you arrange it as you wish; the only limit is your
imagination (and the contents of the virtual cockpit, of course). You
could, for example, have an instance of PSX running solely to display
the PFD or ND on just one of your cockpit screens. The layouts are
defined in the Layout tab on the Instructor station (more about that
In the example of a Gatwick take-off shown below, I have simply
superimposed an FSX window (driven by the VisualPSX free add-on) over
a PSX layout (as you are seeing it here, much detail will be lost,
unfortunately, since the original was 3840 px wide):
But PSX is even more versatile than I have mentioned so far.
It is not limited to Windows
— yes, you read that correctly, it will
run on anything (Windows, Mac, full implementations of Unix or Linux,
you name it) that supports Java 1.6, 1.7, or above, whilst also making
full use of any available graphics acceleration hardware.
That does mean that some tablets will be unable to run it since they
don’t possess a full Java implementation, but otherwise all you need
to do to get PSX running on a different Operating System is to copy
the installation directory from one machine to the other. Many people
run PSX on networked machines using a mixture of O/Ss, and it works
flawlessly. Mac-only setups are common.
Whilst you consider the implications of that revelation, here is a
closer view of the instruments, to enable you to see a little of the
vivid detail available:
PSX’s Instructor Station
PFD and ND
Having started to say something about the Instructor Station, I became
diverted whilst explaining just how flexible PSX is. But we do need to
briefly take a closer look at the Instructor Station, since it
controls every aspect of the experience that PSX brings to the pilot.
|Obviously, as a simmer you will use PSX
differently from the way it’s used in Flight Training schools
and the like: in that context there will be someone testing the pilot in various ways — engine fire at V1,
gradual fuel leak, perhaps a hydraulics failure — and whilst I
have seen a figure quoted that over 500 different malfunctions
can be simulated in PSX, that figure doesn’t include the 400+
circuit breakers which can be pulled....
As a simmer, though, if you use malfunctions (which I strongly
recommend) you will probably use the “General” malfunctions page most
often (illustrated right): as you can see, this enables you to set up
ranges of malfunction probabilities for each phase of the flight — and
also to set random problems for you to find during the cockpit
|The other page that simmers regularly use is the “self-induced” page,
where you can set up very specific scenarios that you wish to
practice. As you can see (right), this is serious stuff (as you would
expect, since it was included for flight training purposes) but
simmers who take their flight simulations seriously have never before
(OK, with the possible exception of PSX’s predecessor PS1, which was
released 15 years ago) had the opportunity to practice exactly the
same drills that professional pilots are subjected to in the “sweat
And if you think that those two pages are testing, wait until you see
the other nine (yes nine!) pages of malfunctions that the Instructor
can deploy to impose specific forms of failure! There are far too many
individual malfunctions to list, but simply the names of the nine
pages will give you some idea of the range of horrors that might be
visited upon the poor pilot from the Instructor Station: Airframe,
Alerts, Bleed, Elec, Engines, Fire, Fuel, Hyd, and Nav. (Be afraid, be
very afraid...). And as you can see in the picture below, you can
additionally pre-program each failure in many different ways.
(Incidentally, when I commented just now that I strongly recommend you
to use malfunctions it’s not because I’m some sort of sadist (or
masochist, either), it’s simply that I believe that flying with zero
possibility of anything going wrong is not only unrealistic, it’s
quite frankly somewhat boring. As I tend to put it, it’s a bit like
playing backgammon without using the doubling cube: a different, and
certainly a very much tamer and considerably blander, affair
Hydraulic failures and activation options
But if the detailed simulation of malfunctions doesn’t appeal to you,
you can (if you insist) quite simply switch them all off until such
time as you know enough about the 744 to be able to deal with them.
Believe me, this simulation has bucket-loads of other goodies for you
I’ll have to confine myself to the most often-used parts of the
Instructor Station, or else this review will be even longer than is
already the case. So I will skip over the Model tab (where you can
select a very specific real-world 744 model to fly); the Analysis tab
(which gives you huge amounts of information about the airports and
navaids in your flight plan); and the Network tab (where you configure
the role of this specific instance of PSX within your environment —
the EULA allows you to run up to four instances of PSX simultaneously
in a home cockpit setup); and move on to the more frequently used
Let’s start with the Preferences tab. Here, you configure how the
simulator starts up, find the IP address to use for this instance
whilst networking, set the frame rate limit (usually to the maximum 72
fps, which are routinely achievable, even on a laptop), select the
audio sounds, and configure the USB hardware controls. Nothing
earth-shaking — apart from the fact that it all works, flawlessly.
This may perhaps be another digression, but I have to say it
somewhere, and here is probably as good as anywhere else: PSX will be
a revelation to those who are inured to FSX with its long startup
times, its shaky support for saving the current sim situation, its
stuttering graphics, its problems with memory.... we know all those
scenarios only too well. But PSX just works. It starts up in about
five seconds on my machine, and if you save a cockpit Situation and
later go back to it, you get back to exactly where you were, every
time. It is rock solid from the stability point of view (forget about
restarting it, let alone rebooting — the need will never arise). Which
caused one happy user to write, on the Aerowinx forum: “The biggest
difference is simply this: PSX you install and start flying
immediately. Everything else you install and start troubleshooting
All 9 Frames
||The next familiar tab in the Instructor station is the Layout tab,
which has been mentioned above. You can define and store as many
“9packs” as you like — as the name suggests, these are groups of nine
layouts, each of which can consist of one, two, three or four
subframes. Using another free utility (this one is called ELVis — see
the list, above), you can review your set of “flightdeck frames” to
ensure that you have the whole cockpit covered, as the example (left)
There may be those who are a little surprised to find that a
simulation as advanced as PSX uses so-called “2D” panels rather than
some variation on the “virtual cockpit” theme. But once again, the
intention is very deliberate, and the trade-offs have all been
carefully considered and calculated.
The fact is that for real world training you need the Primary Flight Display (PFD) to be as
large as possible, positioned in the centre of the monitor, and in
line with the aircraft heading in the windshield — which is easily
achievable thanks to PSX’s innovative layout technology. On the other
hand, if you are a cockpit builder who wants to display just the ND
(for example) on a single monitor, that’s easy to do, as well.
A 3D picture of the cockpit on a 2D monitor screen is far from being
optimal for instrument training, since the representation of the
instruments then becomes way too small for professionals to use. OK,
for VFR purposes, the physical location of the panels can be quickly
absorbed, but for IFR the flexible PSX approach possesses many
advantages that old-fashioned “virtual cockpits” do not — along with
the huge advantage that the primary instruments can be made
sufficiently large so that even tiny movements can be seen and
responded to before they can become significant (no one wants 400
tonnes of jet to be anything other than under complete control at all
Tempting though it would be to review many more of the sub-tabs of the
Instructor station, I must press on. If you would like to know more,
then may I suggest that you could download the generous “taster”
version of the PSX manual from the URL I gave above, and review the
details given there.
PSX in Practice
Hopefully, I have now said enough to sketch out for you some of the
mouth-watering goodies on offer from PSX, but as simmers the real
question we all want answered is — how does it fly?
The answer is, superbly. Although PSX was written by one man (no one
told him it was impossible, so he just went ahead and did it) he has
also had access to the Precision Simulator community, and many of us
have been following the development closely since the days before its
predecessor, PS1, was released, 15 years ago. So whilst there are a number of very experienced simmers on the forum, the professional market for PSX means there are probably even more aviation professionals there, many of whom have contributed their specialist skills during the
development process as part of the beta team. Not only real-world 744
pilots (as well as pilots of other airliner types), but also
engineers, dispatchers, ATCOs, and specialists in other aviation
disciplines have all been involved to a greater or lesser degree, with
the result that the PSX experience is outstanding, rich, and in-depth.
Or, as another recent purchaser delightedly described it — “There are
no placebo switches”: every knob, every switch, (and yes — every
circuit breaker), all are modelled, and all have the effect that a
professional 744 pilot would expect. This is not just a heavy Cessna
that tries to simulate a few of the FMC functions and has, well, quite
a lot of the switches working (no reference to any specific simulated
744 model intended, of course) — PSX is the most complete simulation
of the real aircraft that has ever been available for the home simming
But PSX doesn’t merely simulate a generic 744, though — included “in
the box” (although in fact PSX doesn’t come in a box, just on a DVD)
are 80 airline-specific 744 aircraft for you to choose from, viz.:
|Air Atlanta Icelandic TF-AMZ
Air Bridge Cargo VQ-BGY
Air China B-2456
Air France F-GEXB / F-GITF / F-GITH
Air India VT-ESM
Air New Zealand ZK-NBS / ZK-NBV / ZK-SUH / ZK-SUI / ZK-SUJ
Air Pacific DQ-FJK
Ansett Australia VH-ANA
Atlas Air N409MC
British Airways G-BNLA / G-BNLG / G-BNLH / G-BNLI / G-BNLY /
G-BNLZ / G-BYGA / G-BYGG / G-CIVA / G-CIVC / G-CIVF / G-CIVG /
G-CIVH / G-CIVI / G-CIVR / G-CIVZ
Cargolux Italia LX-KCV
Cathay Pacific B-HOO / B-HUF / B-HUG / B-HUH / B-LIA
China Airlines B-18201 / B-18210 / B-18722
Delta Air Lines N673US / N675NW
El Al 4X-ELC / 4X-ELH
Emirates SkyCargo N40 MC
Japan Airlines JA8074 / JA8081
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines PH-BFG / PH-BFN / PH-BFY / PH-CKB
Korean Air 747-4B5B / 747-4B5F
Lufthansa D-ABTF / D-ABVN / D-ABVZ
Malaysia Airlines 9M-MPM / 9M-MPQ
Philippine Airlines RP-C8168
Qantas Airways VH-OEB / VH-OEE / VH-OEF / VH-OEJ / VH-OJL /
Singapore Airlines Cargo 9V-SFF / 9V-SFQ / 9V-SMU
South African Airways ZS-SAX
Thai Airways InternationaI HS-TGR / HS-TRG
United Airlines N128UA / N193UA
UPS Airlines N570UP / N581UP
Virgin Atlantic Airways G-VAST / G-VFAB / G-VROC
Each of those aircraft comes with the exact configuration of
its real-world counterpart (you can use PAMELA, another free
PSX add-on, to choose between them, based on the specification
you’re looking for). However, if you’re not concerned about
faithfully simulating a particular real-world model, you can
use the Instructor pages to configure your own, choosing
between Combi / Freighter / Passenger / Freighter Extended
Range (ER) / and Passenger Extended Range (ER) models, with
GE, PW or RR engines (no less than three pages of options
await your attention within the Instructor Station to choose
from — see the partial example, right).
So no shortcuts, no “placebo switches”, just 100% full-fat
flight simulation in mind-boggling detail.
A Few Model Config Options
Hence my suggestion at the start of this review that unless you’re
someone who enjoys simulation in depth, PSX will probably not be to
your taste. On the other hand, if you are the sort of person who
enjoys getting all the details absolutely right, you may think you’re
(Did I just hear a ghostly whisper.... something about “As real as it
? Nah, silly of me).
Anyway, permit me to conclude by briefly describing a flight with PSX.
I’ll be using AdaptPSX (although you won’t really notice that) and
also VisualPSX or PSX_Earth to generate some additional eye-candy,
which is especially useful when taxying between the runway
and the gate.
Using VisualPSX does mean, of course, that I’m going to have to fire
up FSX to act as the scenery generator. I could have opted to use
Google Earth or X-Plane for the same purpose (in which case I’d be
using PSX_Earth or XView instead of VisualPSX), but I have spent a lot
(more than the purchase price of PSX, I have to admit) on FSX scenery
over the years, so it seems a shame to waste it, and VisualPSX will
enable me to see it again. But VisualPSX does require FSX as the
scenery generator, and that is expensive not only in terms of start-up
time and all the other ills that FSX is heir to, but notably in the
amount of CPU it will consume, dragging down the PSX performance on my
Without doubt, FSX is the most processor-heavy option. PSX_Earth, on
the other hand, is by far the least (the Google Earth external view
runs in a browser and makes no discernible difference at all
PSX frame rates). With PSX_Earth my frame rates in PSX remain pegged
firmly at 72 fps. With FSX running at the same time and on the same
machine as VisualPSX my poor little i5 processor can only achieve a
maximum of 48 fps in PSX and 30 in FSX. Hey ho — there’s a price tag
One final comment: since my screens are arranged side-by-side I will
be running the eye-candy screen at 1920x1200 px, and PSX itself at
3840x1200 px. Both those sizes of graphic output are considerably
reduced in quality when shrunk down to a size suitable to include
here, I’m afraid, so unfortunately the awe-inspiring quality of the
resolution is something you’re going to have to mostly take my word
A Short Flight With PSX
I have recently been carrying out some experiments with PSX on short
runs between airports with relatively short runways (long haul trips
may be the norm for 744s, but nonetheless they often do short trips as
well, and perfectly happily), and so in this case I will be taking off
from Liverpool (EGGP rwy 27, TORA 7,497 ft), cruising briefly at
FL230, and landing at Southampton (Mutley-land
— rwy 20, LDA 5,266
ft). Obviously, I have very few passengers on board and have loaded
very little fuel for this trip, so I will have no problem in taking
off (unsurprisingly given those four huge engines, my rate of climb
will be quite startling — and before anyone asks YES, that would be
entirely normal for a 747 in such a relatively unusual situation), and
I will then land at Southampton and aim to slow down in time to be
able to comfortably take exit A1 from the runway and taxy in.
I did the trip twice, once using VisualPSX with FSX (and also Aivlasoft EFB running on a networked machine), and then again for comparison
purposes using PSX_Earth — so no FSX that time, just the view from the
Google Earth plug-in running in a browser. Pictures from both
utilities will follow.
Take-off at Liverpool, and a Comparison of
I will skip over the whole routine of starting up and taxying from the
gate. PSX handles it all superbly, of course, although don’t expect a
pushback to GSX standards, the mechanism supplied is simply to enable
you to do so with reasonable authenticity — see the PSX manual under
Instructor | Situation | Service for full details of the way to
achieve this, and the voice responses you will receive. (A similar
consideration applies to the PSX ATC, incidentally: this is not meant
to be a fully featured and flexible representation of ATC — although
well implemented with a variety of voices in different parts of the
world, it is intended for flight training, and hence it will get you
there, but is provided more as a distraction than as a helpful Air
Traffic Control service. Which, of course, is entirely consistent with
the PSX training philosophy. And if you are using ATC you will have to
use the Audio Control Panel and the relevant radios (yes, including HF
where applicable) to be able to hear them).
I should mention also at this point that PSX has its own in-built
checklists. Of course. And your First Officer chats away to you quite
happily, as well as carrying out helpful “silent tasks” (but only if
you wish, as mentioned above). So you are unlikely to feel lonely
during the time before reaching the runway threshold.
But let’s get back to taxying. PSX’s own minimal out-of-the window
view provides all that is required for runways, weather, and horizons,
but taxyways are not included — hence the possible need for the
dedicated home simmer to deploy some form of additional graphical
eye-candy whilst taxying if they want to fully simulate the complete
flight experience. The requirement for additional eye-candy between
take-off and landing is, however, a matter of opinion, and several
professional pilots on the Aerowinx forum have stated that they
frankly prefer the PSX frame-rate-friendly implementation to anything
from another source. Perhaps it’s simply that the professionals don’t
gawp out of the window as much as we simmers do — but, as always with
your own sim, the choice is yours.
So, we have arrived at the threshold, and configured the aircraft for
take-off. Let’s take a look at the views from FSX/VisualPSX and from
PSX_Earth/Google Earth. First of all, here’s FSX/VisualPSX:
FSX RWY 27 Take-off
Notice two things immediately: the first is that it’s raining, which
PSX has picked up from the METAR and injected into FSX via VisualPSX.
The version of VisualPSX in use when this review was being written
suffered from a slight problem whereby the weather intermittently
reverted to being another boringly beautiful day in California — but
that problem has since been fixed (in build 5404).
The other thing to notice is that the runway is flat and level. Now
this is the norm in FSX, of course, since it can’t cope with any
runway that isn’t. PSX, on the other hand, can (and does) cope with
sloping and uneven runways. If you compare the above shot to the one
from PSX_Earth (using Google Earth) below, you will observe that
Google Earth shows you a runway that is not entirely flat (although
from this angle the bumpiness seems slightly exaggerated), and
presumably it also has the same slope as in the real world (although
since that’s only 0.2% at Liverpool, it’s not easy to tell):
PE RWY 27 Take-off
Liverpool to Southampton Route
||It’s not raining here, because Google Earth doesn’t reflect
current conditions, only the conditions when its photos were
originally taken. Similarly, once we take off you will find that the PSX_Earth view doesn’t bank during the turns, since the view is simply
the one you would see from the point in space currently occupied by
But as I said above, the biggest difference experienced between the
two utilities is undoubtedly the PSX frame rates. With FSX (that
well-known CPU-hog) alongside VisualPSX, my PSX frame rate was mostly
around 48 fps, although when complex things were happening it
occasionally dropped quite a bit lower. With PSX_Earth running in a
browser (and hence no FSX), PSX had no difficulty whatsoever in
maintaining 72 fps at all times.
Whilst I had VisualPSX (hence FSX) running alongside PSX, I also
started up Aivlasoft EFB on a second machine. I had previously planned
the route in PFPX (see picture) and exported it to both PSX and EFB,
so this was easy to do. At present, the EFB option won’t be available
without FSX (i.e. when using PSX_Earth, in this case): happily,
however, v2 of Aivlasoft EFB is scheduled to accept input directly
from PSX without the need for FSX, so that will change, in time.
But this is a review of PSX and not the add-ons, so I’ll say no more
about the utilities, although I will use them again to show you a few
more screen shots here and there.
PSX offers a wide variety of options for controlling your virtual 744.
Leaving aside the “Q-codes” which enable cockpit builders to interface
a variety of cards (see the “Networkers” forum on the Aerowinx site
for more details about Q-codes:
), you can use either the mouse, USB devices (yokes, throttles, etc.),
or a plethora of keyboard options. If, like me, you prefer to avoid
the keyboard, then simply use a shareware utility such as JoyToKey to
convert the buttons on your USB devices into keystrokes that are
understood natively by PSX.
For example, to arm the speedbrakes you could:—
● Press the F8 key once.
● Press the USB button that you configured for the speedbrake EXT
● Or simply drag the speedbrake lever with the mouse until the mouse
icon turns orange and says "ARMED".
That’s as well as using Q-codes or else assigning one of your hardware
buttons using JoyToKey, of course.
I also use the old Aerosoft Australia (now no longer trading, sadly)
MCP, which interfaces directly to the MCP within PSX so that I can use
its physical knobs and switches rather than mousing virtual controls
on-screen. Here is my physical Aerosoft MCP (left) alongside the PSX
display version (right):
MCP - Aerosoft Australia
MCP - PSX
So all in all, there is no shortage of available control options!
Getting Ready to Fly
Just as FSX has the ability to save and load “flights”, PSX has what
it terms “Situation files”, or situs, for short. The difference here
is that unlike FSX, PSX is entirely unfussed about returning the sim
to the exact moment when the situ was saved, and never becomes
confused. When you install PSX it comes with a large number of situ
files (right up to and including an encounter with volcanic ash,
departure and approach to St. Maarten, clear air turbulence, localizer
back course approach, step climb, overflying the North pole, even a
landing at Zurich with all four engines out) and you can easily create
your own. (Incidentally, I didn’t say anything about the PSX
installation process for the simple reason that it works perfectly,
does its job in a couple of minutes, and that’s all there is to say: I
have never heard of anyone having the slightest problem with it). You
can also configure PSX to save the current situation at the press of
the EVENT RCD button just above the primary EICAS display, which can
be extremely useful when you find yourself attempting a tricky landing
which you might possibly want — or perhaps need — to try again.
PSX Move Aircraft
So when it comes to getting yourself ready for the trip you can select
any situation you like — although you will usually choose from one of
the basics: cold and dark; on ground with IRSs aligned; on ground and
doors closing; on ground and cleared for engine start; or cleared for
take-off. You will then need to position the aircraft, of course
(which is made exceptionally easy, as these pictures show), and as
mentioned above PSX has every runway in the world which is longer than
4,600 ft / 1400m in its database.
Please note that this isn’t a
recommendation to seriously try to land your 744 on a 4,600 ft runway,
although the Southampton runway isn’t that much longer...
You also need to plan your trip; and you have the choice of either using PFPX and TOPCAT (PSX reads PFPX’s .route files natively, and you can configure PFPX to export its route to PSX for you) or else getting a route from your favourite Internet or standalone source and typing it into the RTE page on the CDU in the usual way.
Having set the specifics of your flight you are then ready to save the
resulting Situation file and fly....
EFB RWY 27 Take-off
Time For Take-off
Bearing in mind the above discussion about taxying from the gate,
quite how you choose to arrive at the runway threshold is up to you,
but once there (having completed the requisite checklists and received
ATC clearance) it’s time to take off. So back on rwy 27 at Liverpool
(the representation in Aivlasoft EFB is shown, left) we push the
throttles forward, and once the engines are stabilised press the TO/GA
button (the virtual F/O confirms “Takeoff power set”). Being fairly
lightly loaded, and also with only 12 tonnes of fuel on board, there
won’t be any question of ending up in the Mersey.
Sure enough, the “Rotate” call comes with a reasonable amount of
runway to spare, and so we gently raise the nose and follow the Flight
Director and then raise the gear (I engaged the autopilot at around
500 feet on this occasion to give me more time to take some pictures
to show you here), and then start to raise the flaps in accordance with
the schedule on the airspeed indicator tape.
The FMC is now controlling the aircraft in LNAV and VNAV mode, so as
we complete our left turn and head out over the Wirral we have a
little time for sightseeing if we have one of the add-on utilities
running. Here is VisualPSX+FSX with a little of PSX alongside:
PSX_Earth/PSX view of the Wirral
And here are the EFB and (below that) PSX_Earth views:
Whilst we’re climbing to cruise altitude, let me briefly describe
another of PSX’s features. Since it incorporates its own planetary
weather system, PSX can readily simulate the uploading of en route
wind information directly into the FMC. It can also, when we get
nearer to our destination, download the descent winds in the same way,
which will improve the FMC’s calculations of ToD point and VNAV
In fact I’ll demonstrate the uploading of the descent wind
information, once we’re in the cruise.
PSX_Earth view of the Wirral
PSX view of forward and CDU panels
As you can see from the above screenshot, we’re currently southwest of
Manchester, approaching the NANTI waypoint and then our Top of Climb,
and will be landing at Southampton in half an hour. Entering the en
route winds (or rather, requesting the PSX weather HQ to upload and
enter them for us) makes a big difference to the way in which the FMC
can get its estimates right — without that information all it can do
is to assume zero winds, which as we know is pretty unlikely, and
hence without wind information its forecasts are bound to be somewhat
less than accurate.
PSX Time Acceleration
But let’s skip forward to later on in the cruise, when we’re
approaching our Top of Descent point. This is easy to do in PSX, since
its time acceleration facilities allow acceleration of up to 64 times,
or alternatively you can choose to jump straight to the next waypoint
If we select VNAV on the CDU and go to page 3 of 3, the FORECAST>
prompt is at LSK 5R: when pressed, this will take you to the DESCENT
FORECAST page. LSK 6L says REQUEST SEND, and when we press the LSK,
the request for our descent winds is transmitted.
We are informed when the uplink is ready, and all we have to do is to
press the LSK again — the data will be uploaded into the FMC, and the
VNAV calculations for the descent optimised. (Unusually, there is no need to EXECute this action, incidentally).
picture (below) shows the PFD and ND about a third of the way though
our descent: notice the vertical path deviation indicator (and the
less reliable but still useful “green banana”): the FMC is now
controlling our descent extremely well!
Descending Towards Southampton
|As you can see from the EFB approach page, this one of the simplest
straight-in approaches that you’re ever likely to find. We almost fly
straight onto the runway.
Of course, there’s always a snag, but this
time it isn’t ATC — it’s the fact that runway 20 at Southampton is
more than a little on the short side for a 744, with a Landing
Distance Available of only 5,266 ft (1605m).... <gulp> Happily, we’re very light indeed, so with autobrakes 4 (or perhaps MAX) and the deployment of reverse thrust on landing we should be able to slow down in time to gracefully take the exit at A1 and head for the terminal.
|That’s the plan,
anyway. So by the time we’re DME 7.9 from Southampton, VirtualPSX with
PSX looks like this:
|Approach DME 7.9
EFB DME 2.5
||As we approach Southampton I do a little bit of heading intervention
to establish us on the localizer a bit sooner than would otherwise be
the case, and then capture the glideslope.
Gear down, flaps 30, speedbrakes armed, VREF + 8 kts target touchdown speed, autobrakes 4,
so final checks looking good: I have opted for an autoland so that I
can take some pics for you on the way in with a view to comparing
FSX/Orbx’s Southampton with Google Earth’s.
|First of all, here is Google Earth’s depiction as we overfly the M3
and the outskirts of Winchester, with Southampton Water just visible
in the distance:
PSX_Earth outskirts of Winchester and the M3 (OM)
PSX_Earth/Google Earth — approaching rwy 20
|As we approach the runway you can compare PSX_Earth (above) with
VisualPSX and PSX (below):
VisualPSX/FSX — approaching rwy 20
On landing, we verify the full extension of the speedbrakes, then deploy the reversers for reverse thrust (until reaching 80 kts).
You will also see (left) that we have landed with 6.1 tonnes of fuel on board, which is very close to the PFPX and TOPCAT forecast for us.
As we rapidly clean up the aircraft and start the APU, we find ourselves in the perfect position to exit onto the taxyway.
And so, as our 744 trundles towards the terminal, we come to the end
of this illustrative mini-flight with PSX. (The next challenge will be
taking off again.... This is a seriously short runway for a 744, but
providing that we’re light, at full take-off thrust there won’t be a
problem — I’ve flown the return leg, just to make sure).
I had originally hoped that I might be able to give you a reasonably
broad overview of the sim, but really I’ve only been able to give you
a mere taste. There is just so much to PSX: it’s a vast program and I
can’t hope to cover more than just a few of its extensive range of
features here, let alone touch on its many extraordinarily detailed
depictions of 744 systems’ behaviour.
You may recall that the
colourful and highly informative manual that comes with it is 600 (A4)
pages long, which helps to give you some idea of the program’s scope.
One aspect which I really must mention is the amazing support which is
available from the Aerowinx forum. It is usual for 744-related
questions to be answered with extraordinary speed, often by the
developer himself, or else by another professional specialist in the
field. Furthermore, the tone is entirely relaxed, supportive, and
civilised. The PSX community really is a community, in fact; and being
a part of it is a very significant benefit for PSX owners.
But enough of the paean of praise — are there any downsides? (I did
briefly refer to these earlier, but let’s explore the issues a little
more, in the interests of giving a balanced review). The accurate
answer has to be: for the PSX target audience of professionals, no;
for some simmers — maybe.
Perhaps the most obvious downside (from a simmer’s perspective) is
that PSX “only” provides sufficient outside views for instrument
training, since the ability to have large instruments is more
essential. Here, for example, is a PSX approach to Amsterdam (blue
lights mark the gate positions):
Approach to Amsterdam
However, the advantage of the design decision to do it this way is
that PSX’s frame rates are outstanding. It also takes advantage of any
graphics acceleration available, so that even comparatively modest
setups usually achieve the 72 fps that PSX aims to provide in order to
give buttery smoothness and total control of the aircraft at all
times. On the other hand, as we have seen, the ability to use external
scenery generators is readily available to you at no extra cost, so if
you would like to do that and have CPU cycles to spare (or perhaps
multiple machines), then an external scenery generator can easily be
added, either on the same machine or via a Local Area Network.
Then there is the issue of cost, which is a real one, of course:
whilst it is amazingly cheap for flight schools, the price of PSX is
still daunting for some simmers — albeit that it is great value when
you consider just how much you are getting for your money (hopefully
the foregoing may have given you some indication of that). Personally, I don’t find the argument that you have probably spent far more on your fsx setup hugely helpful (for me it’s in the same ‘regrets territory’ as altitude above you, runway behind you, and fuel in the tanker) but a cool assessment of how much has been spent on FSX — and much more than FSX itself, the many add-ons that have been purchased over the years — does seem to help to put PSX’s price into perspective for some people.
It’s also the case that some simmers (the flight training schools for
whom PSX is intended don’t perceive this as any kind of a problem, of
course) may perhaps regret the fact that PSX simulates “only” the 744
— albeit with the ability to use a full range of models and engine
types so that the configuration of any real world aircraft can be
replicated. The counter-argument is the complexity and completeness of
the simulation, which has meant that many serious procedural simmers
have been perfectly happy to exchange a plethora of
‘simulated-with-varying-degrees-of-accuracy’ aircraft for one that is
completely and precisely simulated. (Hence "Precision Simulator", I
I used the words “completely and precisely” just now — is PSX perfect?
Well, arguably nothing is, on this crazy planet, and indeed following
the initial release two months ago there is (at the time of writing) a
short list of items which are in the process of being fixed:
● Continue ram air noise when gear doors remain open. *
● FIX INFO: Off-route entries should not blank after leg sequencing.
● Secondary flap drive rate: fine tuning for each step. *
● IRS init check logic: another special condition.
● Takeoff TOGA push: 1 sec delay till mode engagement, 2 sec till A/T
● Spool-up fine tuning (aim for: 26 to 36 in 3 sec, 36 to 66 in 3
● Re-check Voice-ATC T/D detection.
● Re-check Voice-ATC approach clearance to other traffic.
● AFDS FMA: Put VNAV ‘altitude acquire’ sub-mode under the ‘to be
captured’ pitch modes (no SPD mode when VNAV is in clb/des mode). *
● Stab tank transfer faster. *
● Time-jump feature should not ignore fuel ballast requirements.
(*The items marked with an asterisk are ones which have been requested
by real-world 744 pilots).
As you can see, we are looking at a very small number of unusual
conditions, or in fact a tiny
number when one considers the huge
number of features modelled within the aircraft.
Which award? Hmm....
How can I bring this review to a conclusion? Well oddly enough, not in
the same manner as most Mutley’s Hangar
reviews, I fear, for reasons
which I will now explain.
It’s patently obvious that it would be foolish to attempt a
straightforward comparison of PSX with other simming products since,
in Mutley’s words, “There is nothing to judge it against”. PSX is a
simulation for aviation professionals, as we know, but one which is
also open (and, I am happy to say, friendly) to advanced flight
simmers: it has a niche all its own, and that niche is an
extraordinarily deep one. But as a professional product it is in a
class of its own.
It therefore follows that any attempt to compare it to other simming products would be invidious, which means that unfortunately none of the current
awards are appropriate for PSX, since its detail and coverage are vastly greater (and its price correspondingly higher). This unexpected and paradoxical situation put me in mind of the white dragon tile in Mahjong — which unlike all the other colourful tiles is totally blank since it represents the highest order (and as everyone knows, white dragons are invisible).
Respecting the same rationale, the only award for PSX that is available is the highest and invisible one.
The remainder of my closing remarks may repeat some of the information
provided above, here and there, but this is unavoidable during a
summing up, so please forgive me.
To do justice to PSX, permit me to first of all say this. By simmer standards, it's probably reasonable to say that I am fairly well versed in 744 lore and knowledge, having written 'The Big Tutorial' (171 A4 pages and 16 appendices) for PSX's predecessor 15 years ago, maintained a keen interest since then, and written the first two introductory tutorials for PSX (with one more to come). So it was that my first draft of this PSX review quickly began to detail some of the minutiæ of the amazing fidelity of PSX to the 744's systems — before I thought more carefully and realised that the majority of simmers (initially, at least) are probably less interested in aspects of the detailed systems logic than in how it flies, and how PSX integrates into a simmer's universe. So the over-detailed material was excised from the review and I tried again. But nonetheless, I promise you that the finer points are indubitably and substantially there: the fact that I haven't mentioned them very much is simply because I didn't want to put people off (the complexity is there when you want it, but hidden until you need it). So if you explore PSX, you will find all the depth and detail that you could possibly wish for (and that a professional 744 pilot would expect); and the fact that I have failed to convey to you the immense richness of this simulation is entirely my fault, and no possible reflection on the sim itself. (The potential length of a more detailed review was also a factor, to be fair; as was the reflection that my trilogy of tutorials will constitute a kind of extended review in themselves). Indeed, you may have noticed that I have already mentioned on the way through that in writing this review I have struggled somewhat in my attempt to cover some of the program’s high points as an indication of the quality of the whole. However, please bear in mind that this is a hugely comprehensive and wide-ranging simulation which can be used to fly to any large airport world-wide, with current weather, pushback, and ATC and other aircraft — all without needing any additional add-ons — so I fear I must leave you to discover the full range and depth of its amazing features for yourself. (Wow!).
Also, as we have seen, add-ons are available for those who would like
them (such as the ability to use X-Plane or FSX or Google Earth as an
additional scenery generator, as well as other helpful goodies), and
those add-ons are free, courtesy of the talented PSX community.
PSX’s flexibility, especially in terms of screen layouts and control
inputs, is outstanding; and its extensive networking abilities mean
that even a shared cockpit over the Internet (including the provision
of someone standing by at the Instructor Station, if you so wish) is
available for those who want it.
The fact that you can use PSX on any O/S which possesses the requisite
Java support is, to my knowledge, unique among sims; and PSX is
totally stable in all configurations, including when it is running
over a network. Furthermore, you can very easily start PSX, select a
Situation file, and be flying in less than 30 seconds. It is an
In saying all this, however, I am deeply conscious of the fact that I
am a simmer who hugely values the authenticity of my vlying (virtual
flying) experience. The flight simulation community has within it
enthusiasts for many different facets of this
painters and decorators through to warbird fans, from video makers to
bush flyers — and so I am very conscious of the fact that not everyone
will share my own deep appreciation of a hugely detailed simulation
that includes every circuit breaker and light bulb in the cockpit.
However, those with similar tastes will, I know, understand my
Quite simply, if you are looking for a faithful representation of any
model of the 744 — especially if you would welcome the opportunity not
to be burdened by FSX and all its associated legacy of problems — you
will not find the equal of PSX outside a professional Full Flight
Simulator setup. This is a completely fresh approach, and one which
has succeeded brilliantly. So if simulation accuracy is important to
you, you really must consider PSX.
Although you will need to dare to be different.
A .pdf version of this review can be downloaded